https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69675
--- Comment #10 from Pierre Ossman <pierre-bugzi...@ossman.eu> ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (In reply to comment #4)
> > > Something like this:
> >
> > Not really, the selection doesn't work like that - clock has to match
> > exactly to the table value, it is not an upper bound.
>
> I just meant to patch the table so that you end up using the pre-defined
> values for CTS and N rather than calculating them from the formula.
>
> { xxx, 11648, 210937, 17836, 234375, 11648, 140625 }, /* 74.25/1.001 MHz */
>
> Replace xxx with whatever clock value the drm edid code gives you for
> 74.25/1.001 MHz.
>
So what should I actually try for the second patch? What you wrote? Or the
value from the mode line? :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
