On 2023-08-29 14:33, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 01:34:22PM -0400, James Zhu wrote:
@@ -1067,7 +1055,7 @@ static void drm_core_exit(void)
        unregister_chrdev(DRM_MAJOR, "drm");
        debugfs_remove(drm_debugfs_root);
        drm_sysfs_destroy();
-       idr_destroy(&drm_minors_idr);
[JZ] Should we call xa_destroy instead here?
We could, if we expect the xarray to potentially not be empty.
  From what I understand - all minors should be released at this point.
[JZ] In practice,  adding destroy here will be better.
Why do you say that?
[JZ] In case, the future, INIT adds something, need DESTROY to free completely.

Reply via email to