* Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkei...@ideasonboard.com> [230913 11:59]:
> On 12/04/2023 10:39, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > We may not have dsi->dsidev initialized during probe, and that can
> > lead into various dsi related warnings as omap_dsi_host_detach() gets
> > called with dsi->dsidev set to NULL.
> >
> > The warnings can be "Fixed dependency cycle(s)" followed by a
> > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 787 at drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c:4414.
> >
> > Let's fix the warnings by checking for a valid dsi->dsidev.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <t...@atomide.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c
> > @@ -4411,7 +4411,7 @@ static int omap_dsi_host_detach(struct mipi_dsi_host
> > *host,
> > {
> > struct dsi_data *dsi = host_to_omap(host);
> > - if (WARN_ON(dsi->dsidev != client))
> > + if (dsi->dsidev && WARN_ON(dsi->dsidev != client))
> > return -EINVAL;
> > cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dsi->dsi_disable_work);
>
> Shouldn't this rather be
>
> if (!dsi->dsidev)
> return 0;
>
> before the if (WARN_ON(dsi->dsidev != client)) line?
>
> If dsi->dsidev is NULL, then attach hasn't been called, and we shouldn't do
> anything in the detach callback either.
>
> With your change we'll end up doing all the work in the detach callback,
> without ever doing their counterpart in the attach side.
Oops, I'll check that thanks.
Tony
