On 24/08/2023 12:35, Upadhyay, Tejas wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Tvrtko
Ursulin
Sent: Friday, July 7, 2023 6:32 PM
To: intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Implement fdinfo memory stats
printing

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>

Use the newly added drm_print_memory_stats helper to show memory
utilisation of our objects in drm/driver specific fdinfo output.

To collect the stats we walk the per memory regions object lists and
accumulate object size into the respective drm_memory_stats categories.

Objects with multiple possible placements are reported in multiple regions for
total and shared sizes, while other categories are counted only for the
currently active region.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Cc: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamse...@intel.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdcl...@gmail.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
index ffccb6239789..5c77d6987d90 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drm_client.c
@@ -45,6 +45,89 @@ void __i915_drm_client_free(struct kref *kref)  }

  #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
+static void
+obj_meminfo(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
+           struct drm_memory_stats stats[INTEL_REGION_UNKNOWN]) {
+       struct intel_memory_region *mr;
+       u64 sz = obj->base.size;
+       enum intel_region_id id;
+       unsigned int i;
+
+       /* Attribute size and shared to all possible memory regions. */
+       for (i = 0; i < obj->mm.n_placements; i++) {
+               mr = obj->mm.placements[i];
+               id = mr->id;
+
+               if (obj->base.handle_count > 1)
+                       stats[id].shared += sz;
+               else
+                       stats[id].private += sz;
+       }
+
+       /* Attribute other categories to only the current region. */
+       mr = obj->mm.region;
+       if (mr)
+               id = mr->id;
+       else
+               id = INTEL_REGION_SMEM;
+
+       if (!obj->mm.n_placements) {
+               if (obj->base.handle_count > 1)
+                       stats[id].shared += sz;
+               else
+                       stats[id].private += sz;
+       }
+
+       if (i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj)) {
+               stats[id].resident += sz;
+
+               if (!dma_resv_test_signaled(obj->base.resv,
+                                           dma_resv_usage_rw(true)))

Should not DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP also considered active (why only "rw")? Some 
app is syncing with syncjobs and has added dma_fence with DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP during 
execbuf while that BO is busy on waiting on work!

Hmm do we have a path which adds DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP usage in execbuf?

Rob, any comments here? Given how I basically lifted the logic from 686b21b5f6ca ("drm: Add fdinfo memory stats"), does it sound plausible to upgrade the test against all fences?

Regards,

Tvrtko

+                       stats[id].active += sz;
+               else if (i915_gem_object_is_shrinkable(obj) &&
+                        obj->mm.madv == I915_MADV_DONTNEED)
+                       stats[id].purgeable += sz;
+       }
+}
+
+static void show_meminfo(struct drm_printer *p, struct drm_file *file)
+{
+       struct drm_memory_stats stats[INTEL_REGION_UNKNOWN] = {};
+       struct drm_i915_file_private *fpriv = file->driver_priv;
+       struct i915_drm_client *client = fpriv->client;
+       struct drm_i915_private *i915 = fpriv->i915;
+       struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+       struct intel_memory_region *mr;
+       struct list_head *pos;
+       unsigned int id;
+
+       /* Public objects. */
+       spin_lock(&file->table_lock);
+       idr_for_each_entry (&file->object_idr, obj, id)
+               obj_meminfo(obj, stats);
+       spin_unlock(&file->table_lock);
+
+       /* Internal objects. */
+       rcu_read_lock();
+       list_for_each_rcu(pos, &client->objects_list) {
+               obj = i915_gem_object_get_rcu(list_entry(pos, typeof(*obj),
+                                                        client_link));
+               if (!obj)
+                       continue;
+               obj_meminfo(obj, stats);
+               i915_gem_object_put(obj);
+       }
+       rcu_read_unlock();
+
+       for_each_memory_region(mr, i915, id)
+               drm_print_memory_stats(p,
+                                      &stats[id],
+                                      DRM_GEM_OBJECT_RESIDENT |
+                                      DRM_GEM_OBJECT_PURGEABLE,
+                                      mr->name);
+}
+
  static const char * const uabi_class_names[] = {
        [I915_ENGINE_CLASS_RENDER] = "render",
        [I915_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY] = "copy",
@@ -106,6 +189,8 @@ void i915_drm_client_fdinfo(struct drm_printer *p,
struct drm_file *file)
         *
****************************************************************
**
         */

+       show_meminfo(p, file);
+
        if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) < 8)
                return;

--
2.39.2

Reply via email to