Dne ponedeljek, 05. februar 2024 ob 21:34:04 CET je Frank Oltmanns napisal(a):
>
> On 2024-02-05 at 18:56:09 +0100, Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Dne ponedeljek, 05. februar 2024 ob 16:22:26 CET je Frank Oltmanns
> > napisal(a):
> >> According to the Allwinner User Manual, the Allwinner A64 requires
> >> PLL-MIPI to run at 500MHz-1.4GHz. Add support for that to ccu_nkm.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Frank Oltmanns <fr...@oltmanns.dev>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> >> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.h | 2 ++
> >> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
> >> b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
> >> index 1168d894d636..7d135908d6e0 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.c
> >> @@ -181,6 +181,12 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nkm_round_rate(struct
> >> ccu_mux_internal *mux,
> >> if (nkm->common.features & CCU_FEATURE_FIXED_POSTDIV)
> >> rate *= nkm->fixed_post_div;
> >>
> >> + if (nkm->min_rate && rate < nkm->min_rate)
> >> + rate = nkm->min_rate;
> >> +
> >> + if (nkm->max_rate && rate > nkm->max_rate)
> >> + rate = nkm->max_rate;
> >
> > Please take a look at ccu_nm_round_rate() code. You need to consider postdiv
> > and you can return immediately.
>
> There is a difference here insofar that ccu_nm is always connected to a
> fixed rate parent (at least that's my understanding). Therefore, in
> ccu_nm_round_rate() we can be sure that the min or max rate can really
> be set. In ccu_nkm we don't have that luxury, we actually have to find a
> rate that is approximately equal to the min and max rate, based on the
> parent rate. Therefore, we can't return immediately.
Good point.
>
> Also, I'm not sure what you mean about me needing to consider postdiv.
> That's what I did. The check is after multiplying with the postdiv. It's
> the same as in ccu_nm_round_rate() (just minus the immediate return).
Nevermind, this applies only for immediate return.
Best regards,
Jernej
>
> >
> >> +
> >> if (!clk_hw_can_set_rate_parent(&nkm->common.hw))
> >> rate = ccu_nkm_find_best(*parent_rate, rate, &_nkm,
> >> &nkm->common);
> >> else
> >> @@ -220,6 +226,13 @@ static int ccu_nkm_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> >> unsigned long rate,
> >> _nkm.min_m = 1;
> >> _nkm.max_m = nkm->m.max ?: 1 << nkm->m.width;
> >>
> >> +
> >> + if (nkm->min_rate && rate < nkm->min_rate)
> >> + rate = nkm->min_rate;
> >> +
> >> + if (nkm->max_rate && rate > nkm->max_rate)
> >> + rate = nkm->max_rate;
> >> +
> >
> > No need for this, clk subsystem calls round rate before setting actual clock
> > rate.
>
> I'll remove the checks in V3.
>
> Best regards,
> Frank
>
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Jernej
> >
> >> ccu_nkm_find_best(parent_rate, rate, &_nkm, &nkm->common);
> >>
> >> spin_lock_irqsave(nkm->common.lock, flags);
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.h
> >> b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.h
> >> index c409212ee40e..358a9df6b6a0 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nkm.h
> >> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ struct ccu_nkm {
> >> struct ccu_mux_internal mux;
> >>
> >> unsigned int fixed_post_div;
> >> + unsigned long min_rate;
> >> + unsigned long max_rate;
> >> unsigned long max_m_n_ratio;
> >> unsigned long min_parent_m_ratio;
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
