On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:17:33AM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 08:55:41AM -0800, Matt Roper wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 02:59:23PM +0100, Andi Shyti wrote: > > > The hardware should not dynamically balance the load between CCS > > > engines. Wa_16016805146 recommends disabling it across all > > > > Is this the right workaround number? When I check the database, this > > workaround was rejected on both DG2-G10 and DG2-G11, and doesn't even > > have an entry for DG2-G12. > > > > There are other workarounds that sound somewhat related to load > > balancing (e.g., part 3 of Wa_14019159160), but what's asked there is > > more involved than just setting one register bit and conflicts a bit > > with the second patch of this series. > > thanks for checking it. Indeed the WA I mentioned is limited to > a specific platform. This recommendation comes in different WA, > e.g. this one: Wa_14019186972 (3rd point). Will start using that > as a reference.
actually you are right, I checked with Joonas and I will use Wa_14019159160. Thanks, Andi
