On 29/03/2024 11:27, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 1:45 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlow...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> virtio core already sets the .owner, so driver does not need to. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlow...@linaro.org> >> >> --- >> >> Depends on the first patch. >> --- >> drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c | 1 - >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c >> index fcc5e8c08973..9fae8e396c58 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c >> @@ -653,7 +653,6 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_gpio_driver = { >> .remove = virtio_gpio_remove, >> .driver = { >> .name = KBUILD_MODNAME, >> - .owner = THIS_MODULE, >> }, >> }; >> module_virtio_driver(virtio_gpio_driver); >> >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> > > Applied, thanks!
I expressed dependency in two places: cover letter and this patch. Please drop it, because without dependency this won't work. Patch could go with the dependency and with your ack or next cycle. Best regards, Krzysztof