On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 01:57:46PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote: > Hi, > > > On 2024/4/26 14:23, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 04:43:18AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote: > > > On 2024/4/26 03:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 02:08:16AM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote: > > > > > On 2024/4/25 22:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > It seems driver missed the point of proper use of device property > > > > > > APIs. > > > > > > Correct this by updating headers and calls respectively. > > > > > You are using the 'seems' here exactly saying that you are not 100% > > > > > sure. > > > > > > > > > > Please allow me to tell you the truth: This patch again has ZERO > > > > > effect. > > > > > It fix nothing. And this patch is has the risks to be wrong. > > > > Huh?! Really, stop commenting the stuff you do not understand. > > > I'm actually a professional display drivers developer at the downstream > > > in the past, despite my contribution to upstream is less. But I believe > > > that all panel driver developers know what I'm talking about. So please > > > have take a look at my replies. > > Most of the interactions you had in this series has been uncalled for. > > You might be against a patch, but there's no need to go to such length. > > > > As far as I'm concerned, this patch is fine to me in itself, and I don't > > see anything that would prevent us from merging it. > > No one is preventing you, as long as don't misunderstanding what other > people's technical replies intentionally. I'm just a usual and normal > contributor, I hope the world will better than yesterday.
You should seriously consider your tone when replying then. > Saying such thing to me may not proper, I guess you may want to talk > to peoples who has the push rights I think you misunderstood me. My point was that your several rants were uncalled for and aren't the kind of things we're doing here. I know very well how to get a patch merged, thanks. > just make sure it isn't a insult to the professionalism of drm bridge > community itself though. I'm not sure why you're bringing the bridge community or its professionalism. It's a panel, not a bridge, and I never doubted the professionalism of anyone. Maxime
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
