Hi, Jayesh

On 5/31/24 21:33, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Hi Jayesh,

+
   static const struct drm_bridge_funcs sii902x_bridge_funcs = {
        .attach = sii902x_bridge_attach,
        .mode_set = sii902x_bridge_mode_set,
@@ -516,6 +529,7 @@ static const struct drm_bridge_funcs sii902x_bridge_funcs = 
{
        .atomic_destroy_state = drm_atomic_helper_bridge_destroy_state,
        .atomic_get_input_bus_fmts = sii902x_bridge_atomic_get_input_bus_fmts,
        .atomic_check = sii902x_bridge_atomic_check,
+       .mode_valid = sii902x_bridge_mode_valid,

As you have the possibility to test the driver, it would be nice with a
follow-up patch that replaces the use of enable() / disable() with the
atomic counterparts.

enable() / disable() are deprecated, so it is nice to reduce their use.

I agree with Sam.

Please using atomic uniformally with a follow-up patch, the mixed
using of atomic API and non atomic API is a little bit confusing IMO.


        Sam

Reply via email to