On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 09:18:14AM +0200, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Rework the TTM swapping to use the LRU walker helper.
> This helps fixing up the ttm_bo_swapout() interface
> to be consistent about not requiring any locking.
>
> For now mimic the current behaviour of using trylock
> only. We could be using ticket-locks here but defer
> that until it's deemed necessary. The TTM swapout
> functionality is a bit weird anyway since it
> alternates between memory types without exhausting
> TTM_PL_SYSTEM first.
>
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
> Cc: Somalapuram Amaranath <amaranath.somalapu...@amd.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.br...@intel.com>
> Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellst...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c | 30 ++-------
> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h | 5 +-
> 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> index 43eda720657f..63a91b77f7da 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> @@ -1118,11 +1118,23 @@ int ttm_bo_wait_ctx(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_wait_ctx);
>
> -int ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, struct ttm_operation_ctx
> *ctx,
> - gfp_t gfp_flags)
> +/**
> + * struct ttm_bo_swapout_walk - Parameters for the swapout walk
> + */
> +struct ttm_bo_swapout_walk {
> + /** @walk: The walk base parameters. */
> + struct ttm_lru_walk walk;
> + /** @gfp_flags: The gfp flags to use for ttm_tt_swapout() */
> + gfp_t gfp_flags;
> +};
> +
> +static long
> +ttm_bo_swapout_cb(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk, struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> {
> - struct ttm_place place;
> - bool locked;
> + struct ttm_place place = {.mem_type = bo->resource->mem_type};
> + struct ttm_bo_swapout_walk *swapout_walk =
> + container_of(walk, typeof(*swapout_walk), walk);
> + struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx = walk->ctx;
> long ret;
>
> /*
> @@ -1131,28 +1143,29 @@ int ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
> * The driver may use the fact that we're moving from SYSTEM
> * as an indication that we're about to swap out.
> */
> - memset(&place, 0, sizeof(place));
> - place.mem_type = bo->resource->mem_type;
> - if (!ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(bo, ctx, &place, &locked, NULL))
> - return -EBUSY;
> + if (!bo->bdev->funcs->eviction_valuable(bo, &place)) {
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> if (!bo->ttm || !ttm_tt_is_populated(bo->ttm) ||
> bo->ttm->page_flags & TTM_TT_FLAG_EXTERNAL ||
> - bo->ttm->page_flags & TTM_TT_FLAG_SWAPPED ||
> - !ttm_bo_get_unless_zero(bo)) {
> - if (locked)
> - dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
> - return -EBUSY;
> + bo->ttm->page_flags & TTM_TT_FLAG_SWAPPED) {
> + ret = -EBUSY;
I think answers my -EBUSY question from here [1]. In these cases we
continue LRU walk as eviction of the BO is not valuable.
[1]
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/599606/?series=131815&rev=5#comment_1091419
> + goto out;
> }
>
> if (bo->deleted) {
> - ret = ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(bo, false, false, locked);
> - ttm_bo_put(bo);
> - return ret == -EBUSY ? -ENOSPC : ret;
> - }
> + pgoff_t num_pages = bo->ttm->num_pages;
>
> - /* TODO: Cleanup the locking */
> - spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + ret = ttm_bo_wait_ctx(bo, ctx);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> +
> + ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use(bo);
> + ret = num_pages;
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> /*
> * Move to system cached
> @@ -1164,12 +1177,13 @@ int ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
> memset(&hop, 0, sizeof(hop));
> place.mem_type = TTM_PL_SYSTEM;
> ret = ttm_resource_alloc(bo, &place, &evict_mem);
> - if (unlikely(ret))
> + if (ret)
> goto out;
>
> ret = ttm_bo_handle_move_mem(bo, evict_mem, true, ctx, &hop);
> - if (unlikely(ret != 0)) {
> - WARN(ret == -EMULTIHOP, "Unexpected multihop in swaput
> - likely driver bug.\n");
> + if (ret) {
> + WARN(ret == -EMULTIHOP,
> + "Unexpected multihop in swapout - likely driver
> bug.\n");
> ttm_resource_free(bo, &evict_mem);
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -1179,30 +1193,54 @@ int ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
> * Make sure BO is idle.
> */
> ret = ttm_bo_wait_ctx(bo, ctx);
> - if (unlikely(ret != 0))
> + if (ret)
> goto out;
>
> ttm_bo_unmap_virtual(bo);
> -
> - /*
> - * Swap out. Buffer will be swapped in again as soon as
> - * anyone tries to access a ttm page.
> - */
> if (bo->bdev->funcs->swap_notify)
> bo->bdev->funcs->swap_notify(bo);
>
> if (ttm_tt_is_populated(bo->ttm))
> - ret = ttm_tt_swapout(bo->bdev, bo->ttm, gfp_flags);
> + ret = ttm_tt_swapout(bo->bdev, bo->ttm,
> swapout_walk->gfp_flags);
> out:
> + /* Consider some error codes fatal. Others may continue the walk. */
> + if (ret == -ENOMEM || ret == -EINTR || ret == -ERESTARTSYS ||
> + ret == -EAGAIN || ret > 0)
> + return ret;
Would it be more robust / clear to do the inverse of this? i.e. Return 0
on non-fatal error codes?
>
> - /*
> - * Unreserve without putting on LRU to avoid swapping out an
> - * already swapped buffer.
> - */
> - if (locked)
> - dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
> - ttm_bo_put(bo);
> - return ret == -EBUSY ? -ENOSPC : ret;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +const struct ttm_lru_walk_ops ttm_swap_ops = {
> + .process_bo = ttm_bo_swapout_cb,
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * ttm_bo_swapout() - Swap out buffer objects on the LRU list to shmem.
> + * @bdev: The ttm device.
> + * @ctx: The ttm_operation_ctx governing the swapout operation.
> + * @man: The resource manager whose resources / buffer objects are
> + * goint to be swapped out.
> + * @gfp_flags: The gfp flags used for shmem page allocations.
> + * @target: The desired number of pages to swap out.
> + *
> + * Return: The number of pages actually swapped out, or negative error code
> + * on error.
> + */
> +long ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
> + struct ttm_resource_manager *man, gfp_t gfp_flags,
> + pgoff_t target)
> +{
> + struct ttm_bo_swapout_walk swapout_walk = {
> + .walk = {
> + .ops = &ttm_swap_ops,
> + .ctx = ctx,
> + .trylock_only = true,
> + },
> + .gfp_flags = gfp_flags,
> + };
> +
> + return ttm_lru_walk_for_evict(&swapout_walk.walk, bdev, man, target);
> }
>
> void ttm_bo_tt_destroy(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
> index f9e9b1ec8c8a..ee575d8a54c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
> @@ -148,40 +148,20 @@ int ttm_global_swapout(struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
> gfp_t gfp_flags)
> int ttm_device_swapout(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct ttm_operation_ctx
> *ctx,
> gfp_t gfp_flags)
> {
> - struct ttm_resource_cursor cursor;
> struct ttm_resource_manager *man;
> - struct ttm_resource *res;
> unsigned i;
> - int ret;
> + long lret;
>
> - spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> for (i = TTM_PL_SYSTEM; i < TTM_NUM_MEM_TYPES; ++i) {
> man = ttm_manager_type(bdev, i);
> if (!man || !man->use_tt)
> continue;
>
> - ttm_resource_manager_for_each_res(man, &cursor, res) {
> - struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = res->bo;
> - uint32_t num_pages;
> -
> - if (!bo || bo->resource != res)
> - continue;
> -
> - num_pages = PFN_UP(bo->base.size);
> - ret = ttm_bo_swapout(bo, ctx, gfp_flags);
> - /* ttm_bo_swapout has dropped the lru_lock */
> - if (!ret) {
> - ttm_resource_cursor_fini(&cursor);
> - return num_pages;
> - }
> - if (ret != -EBUSY) {
> - ttm_resource_cursor_fini(&cursor);
> - return ret;
> - }
> - }
> + lret = ttm_bo_swapout(bdev, ctx, man, gfp_flags, 1);
With a target of 1 this will evict exactly 1 various sized BO which
seems to match the current behavior.
Just curious what is the usage of this function which evicts 1 BO from
the device?
Matt
> + /* Can be both positive (num_pages) and negative (error) */
> + if (lret)
> + return lret;
> }
> - ttm_resource_cursor_fini_locked(&cursor);
> - spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_device_swapout);
> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
> index 8b032298d66e..472a55b69afb 100644
> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
> @@ -410,8 +410,9 @@ void ttm_bo_kunmap(struct ttm_bo_kmap_obj *map);
> int ttm_bo_vmap(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, struct iosys_map *map);
> void ttm_bo_vunmap(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, struct iosys_map *map);
> int ttm_bo_mmap_obj(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct ttm_buffer_object
> *bo);
> -int ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, struct ttm_operation_ctx
> *ctx,
> - gfp_t gfp_flags);
> +long ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
> + struct ttm_resource_manager *man, gfp_t gfp_flags,
> + pgoff_t target);
> void ttm_bo_pin(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
> void ttm_bo_unpin(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
> int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_device *bdev,
> --
> 2.44.0
>
