On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at googlemail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 05:56:04PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> If you could geneate a patchset w/o i915 parts for testing would be cool. >>> Thanks in advance. >> >> Just drop patches 5-9 (you can apply patch 8 without any problems, it's >> just not gonna do anything without patch 9 ;). After all, this patch >> series is supposed to be bisectable, so stopping anywhere in between >> should result in a working kernel. >> >> -Daniel >> -- >> Daniel Vetter >> Mail: daniel at ffwll.ch >> Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 >> > > Njet :-( > > I am cloning linux-next GIT and pull into drm-next to see if there is > sth. missing. > > - Sedat - >
NOPE, linux-next is up-to-date what drm-next concerns. - Sedat - sd at tbox:/mnt/sdb5/linux-kernel$ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git Cloning into linux-next... remote: Counting objects: 3084175, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (404388/404388), done. remote: Total 3084175 (delta 2687481), reused 3050014 (delta 2653407) Receiving objects: 100% (3084175/3084175), 513.53 MiB | 566 KiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (2687481/2687481), done. sd at tbox:/mnt/sdb5/linux-kernel$ tar -cf files/linux-next_git_next-20101112.tar linux-next/ sd at tbox:/mnt/sdb5/linux-kernel$ cd linux-next/ sd at tbox:/mnt/sdb5/linux-kernel/linux-next$ git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git drm-next
