Hello Heiko,

On 2024-11-08 14:56, Heiko Stübner wrote:
Am Freitag, 8. November 2024, 14:53:57 CET schrieb Dragan Simic:
Perform a few trivial code cleanups, to make one logged message a bit more consistent with the other logged messages by capitalizing its first word, and
to avoid line wrapping by using the 100-column width better.

No intended functional changes are introduced by these code cleanups.

Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c | 12 ++++--------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
index 58a44af0e9ad..f451e70efbdd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi-rockchip.c
@@ -1379,7 +1379,7 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        }

        if (!dsi->cdata) {
-               DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "no dsi-config for %s node\n", np->name);
+               DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "No dsi-config for %s node\n", np->name);

this is all probe-related, why not convert to dev_err_probe?

As the doc states [0], DRM_DEV_ERROR is deprecated in favor of dev_err.
So dev_err_probe would be the correct way to go?

Thanks for your quick response!  Seeing that DRM_DEV_ERROR() is now
deprecated (which I originally missed, in all honesty) makes me very
happy. :)  I've never been a huge fan of the format of the messages
that DRM_DEV_ERROR() produces.

However, perhaps it would be better to keep these patches as-is, as
some kind of an intermediate, limited-scope cleanup + bugfix combo,
and leave the complete DRM_DEV_ERROR() --> dev_err()/dev_err_probe()
conversion to separate patches.  I think it would be better to avoid
a partial conversion, and I'll be more than happy to put the complete
conversion on my TODO list. :)

[0] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.11.6/source/include/drm/drm_print.h#L431

                return -EINVAL;
        }

@@ -1408,19 +1408,16 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                        dsi->pllref_clk = NULL;
                } else {
                        ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->pllref_clk);
-                       DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev,
-                                     "Unable to get pll reference clock: %d\n",
-                                     ret);
+ DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "Unable to get pll reference clock: %d\n", ret);
                        return ret;
                }
        }

        if (dsi->cdata->flags & DW_MIPI_NEEDS_PHY_CFG_CLK) {
                dsi->phy_cfg_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "phy_cfg");
                if (IS_ERR(dsi->phy_cfg_clk)) {
                        ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->phy_cfg_clk);
-                       DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev,
-                                     "Unable to get phy_cfg_clk: %d\n", ret);
+                       DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "Unable to get phy_cfg_clk: %d\n", 
ret);
                        return ret;
                }
        }
@@ -1465,8 +1462,7 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_rockchip_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        if (IS_ERR(dsi->dmd)) {
                ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->dmd);
                if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
-                       DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev,
-                                     "Failed to probe dw_mipi_dsi: %d\n", ret);
+                       DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev, "Failed to probe dw_mipi_dsi: %d\n", 
ret);
                return ret;
        }


Reply via email to