On 18/06/2025 15:58, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>> >>> In this case you can send a fix for 10nm separately, but please post a >>> fix for that platform too. >>> >>>> >>>> Or merge this code without this patch if a fix for reading PLL as zero >>>> anyhow is questionable for you. >>> >>> I think I've asked it at some point, to split the generic code parts and >>> the DSI enablement into two different patch series, so that they could >>> be picked up separately. >>> >>> No, the fix is not questionable. The patch causes questions though. >> >> I have no interests in fixing DRM code. This is not my subsystem, this >> is not part I am responsible for. If it raises questions, why not >> devoting your time to fix it? > > Then why are you submitting patches towards the DRM driver? I think the > usual rules apply, you not having interest doesn't lower the bar for > your submissions.
I have interest in solving one particular problem, not solving unrelated DRM issues. One is not necessary for the other. Best regards, Krzysztof
