On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 03:57:12PM -0500, Chenyuan Yang wrote:
> drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder and
> drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state could return Null.
> Thus, add the null pointer check for them with a similar format with
> lt9611_bridge_atomic_enable in LT9611.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chenyuan Yang <chenyua...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9211.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9211.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9211.c
> index 9b2dac9bd63c..6be30c8bdf15 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9211.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9211.c
> @@ -463,6 +463,7 @@ static void lt9211_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge 
> *bridge,
>       const struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
>       const struct drm_display_mode *mode;
>       struct drm_connector *connector;
> +     struct drm_connector_state *conn_state;
>       struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>       bool lvds_format_24bpp;
>       bool lvds_format_jeida;
> @@ -516,8 +517,18 @@ static void lt9211_atomic_enable(struct drm_bridge 
> *bridge,
>        */
>       connector = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_for_encoder(state,
>                                                            bridge->encoder);
> -     crtc = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state(state, connector)->crtc;
> +     if (WARN_ON(!connector))
> +             return;
> +
> +     conn_state = drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state(state, connector);
> +     if (WARN_ON(!conn_state))
> +             return;
> +
> +     crtc = conn_state->crtc;
>       crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, crtc);
> +     if (WARN_ON(!crtc_state))
> +             return;
> +

Ditto, that condition is never supposed to happen. How did you notice that bug?

Maxime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to