is this a problem? before trying to submit a solution I wanted to make
sure with the experts


it seems open_count isn't locked and can cause problems


and if it is a problem, and needs to be solved, should locking be done
or is it better implemented with the (as I understand standard) kref?



http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.37/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fops.c#L121

int drm_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{
..<no lock>..

        retcode = drm_open_helper(inode, filp, dev);
        if (!retcode) {
                atomic_inc(&dev->counts[_DRM_STAT_OPENS]);
                if (!dev->open_count++)
                        retcode = drm_setup(dev);
        }

..
}


int drm_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{
..<global lock>..
        if (!--dev->open_count) {
                if (atomic_read(&dev->ioctl_count)) {
                        DRM_ERROR("Device busy: %d\n",
                                  atomic_read(&dev->ioctl_count));
                        retcode = -EBUSY;
                } else
                        retcode = drm_lastclose(dev);
        }
        mutex_unlock(&drm_global_mutex);
}
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20110206/045755f8/attachment.htm>

Reply via email to