On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 5:31 PM Danilo Krummrich <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu Sep 4, 2025 at 4:16 AM CEST, Dave Airlie wrote: > > From: Dave Airlie <[email protected]> > > > > While discussing cgroups we noticed a problem where you could export > > a BO to a dma-buf without having it ever being backed or accounted for. > > > > This meant in low memory situations or eventually with cgroups, a > > lower privledged process might cause the compositor to try and allocate > > a lot of memory on it's behalf and this could fail. At least make > > sure the exporter has managed to allocate the RAM at least once > > before exporting the object. > > The below use of TTM_PL_FLAG_MEMCG suggests that this goes on top of your > cgroup > patch series. However, wouldn't a similar change make sense regardless?
Indeed, I just rebased it onto misc-next and dropped that parameter today. Dave. >
