Hi Daniel,
On 2025-09-25 at 14:42:44 +0200, Daniel Almeida wrote:
> Hi Kamil,
> 
> > On 16 Sep 2025, at 14:12, Kamil Konieczny <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Daniel,
> > On 2025-09-12 at 15:19:29 -0300, Daniel Almeida wrote:
> >> Add the necessary code needed to compile panthor tests as well as the
> >> basic infrastructure that will be used by the Panthor tests themselves.
> >> 
> >> To make sure everything is in order, add a basic test in
> >> panthor_query.c.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Almeida <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >> lib/igt_panthor.c             | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> lib/igt_panthor.h             | 12 ++++++++++
> >> lib/meson.build               |  1 +
> >> meson.build                   |  8 +++++++
> >> tests/meson.build             |  2 ++
> >> tests/panthor/meson.build     | 12 ++++++++++
> >> tests/panthor/panthor_query.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 7 files changed, 101 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 lib/igt_panthor.c
> >> create mode 100644 lib/igt_panthor.h
> >> create mode 100644 tests/panthor/meson.build
> >> create mode 100644 tests/panthor/panthor_query.c
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/lib/igt_panthor.c b/lib/igt_panthor.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000..0b690f796
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/lib/igt_panthor.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> >> +// SPDX-FileCopyrightText: Copyright (C) 2025 Collabora Ltd.
> > 
> > We use SPD for licence because they are long texts. I do not
> > see any benefit of SPDX for copyright lines, it makes it even
> > longer than needed. It could stay if you want.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Kamil Konieczny <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Kamil
> > 
> 
> I’d rather keep it. I tend to favor standardization and having a standard
> way to declare copyrights seems beneficial to me. What are the next steps 
> here?
> Should I send a new version to pickup the tags, or can this be merged already?
> 
> Same for the other patch.
> 
> — Daniel
> 
> 
Will anyone familiar with Pathor do a full review or are you ok
with only my ack? If ack + tested-by is ok I could merge it.

Regards,
Kamil

Reply via email to