On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 11:51:47PM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 11:12:48AM +0200, David Heidelberg via B4 Relay wrote: > > From: David Heidelberg <[email protected]> > > > > Follow up commit introduce the proper device tree definition for the DDIC. > > And the reason being? > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <[email protected]> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-simple-dsi.yaml | 2 > > -- > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-simple-dsi.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-simple-dsi.yaml > > index > > 9b92a05791ccf99061ab7a1e01937bb832a96fe6..6c1249a224c8a170b33fd3f331f985f16914cb2c > > 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-simple-dsi.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-simple-dsi.yaml > > @@ -56,8 +56,6 @@ properties: > > - panasonic,vvx10f034n00 > > # Samsung s6e3fa7 1080x2220 based AMS559NK06 AMOLED panel > > - samsung,s6e3fa7-ams559nk06 > > - # Samsung s6e3fc2x01 1080x2340 AMOLED panel > > - - samsung,s6e3fc2x01
If this is already in use, you can't just remove it. In the end, compatible is just a unique id. So if this referred to a specific panel used, then we are stuck with it even if the naming is not ideal. Rob
