On 02/01/2026 at 12:04, Miguel Ojeda wrote: > On Thu, Jan 1, 2026 at 9:13 PM Nicolas Schier <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> thanks! I think it's a bit sad to keep code only to make some checker >> tooling happy, but for now it seems to be the right thing to do. > > Perhaps a patch to add a comment explaining Vincent's findings would > be a good outcome, i.e. explaining the reason it needs to remain in > place for the moment
OK. But I will send this as a separate patch as a reply to this thread so that this can be discussed separately without having to respin the main series again and again. I will add it back to the main series only if it get a decent level of Acked-by tags. > (even a link to lore.kernel.org to this thread would help). It is rather uncommon to add lore.kernel.org links in the code comment. But I am not against. I will do as you suggested so and see what people think of it. Yours sincerely, Vincent Mailhol
