On 12/8/25 1:48 AM, Antonio Borneo wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-12-08 at 09:55 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2025, at 03:04, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216748
>>>
>>> The bugzilla entry includes a Perl script and a shell script.
>>> This is the edited result of running them (I removed some entries that
>>> were noise).
>>>
>>> I'll try to Cc: all of the relevant mailing lists or individuals.
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> MACH_STM32MP25 ---
>>> drivers/pinctrl/stm32/Kconfig:58: default MACH_STM32MP25 ||
>>> (ARCH_STM32
>>> && ARM64)
>>
>> This was likely intended for 32-bit kernels on 64-bit STM32MP25
>> chips, which we don't support. I think this can go.
>
> Yes, I fully agree!
>
> I have a series pinctrl stm32 to be rebased on v6.19-rc1 and I can include the
> drop of MACH_STM32MP25 inside it.
and what about this dangling symbol?
arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms:375: select ARM_SMC_MBOX
It was merged with ARCH_STM32 in
9e4e24414cc6 ("arm64: introduce STM32 family on Armv8 architecture")
Same answer as for MACH_STM32MP25?
If so, Antonio, can you take care of that one also, please?
thanks.
--
~Randy
