On Wed Jan 7, 2026 at 4:23 AM CET, Vladimir Yakovlev wrote:
> On some systems the interrupt pin may not be used.
> In this case we exclude DRM_BRIDGE_OP_HPD from supported operations,
> after which a polling thread is started to detect the connection.
> (the default polling period for DRM is 10 seconds)
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Yakovlev <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c
> index bb5cff021c93..f7a74ec1f170 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c
> @@ -851,19 +851,25 @@ static int lt9611uxc_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>       init_waitqueue_head(&lt9611uxc->wq);
>       INIT_WORK(&lt9611uxc->work, lt9611uxc_hpd_work);
>
> -     ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, client->irq, NULL,
> -                                     lt9611uxc_irq_thread_handler,
> -                                     IRQF_ONESHOT, "lt9611uxc", lt9611uxc);
> -     if (ret) {
> -             dev_err(dev, "failed to request irq\n");
> -             goto err_disable_regulators;
> +     if (client->irq) {
> +             ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, client->irq, NULL,
> +                                             lt9611uxc_irq_thread_handler,
> +                                             IRQF_ONESHOT, "lt9611uxc", 
> lt9611uxc);
> +             if (ret) {
> +                     dev_err(dev, "failed to request irq\n");
> +                     goto err_disable_regulators;
> +             }
> +             dev_dbg(dev, "Uses IRQ\n");
> +     } else {
> +             dev_dbg(dev, "The interrupt (IRQ) is not specified in the 
> DTS.\n");
> +             dev_dbg(dev, "Check the interrupt (IRQ) or polling will be 
> used!!!\n");
>       }

Thanks for having moved form a warning to a dbg. However these 2 lines are
overly verbose and that's not really needed. I would prefer to see all
those 3 dev_dbg() disappear honestly, being polling a perfectly supported
use case here. But if you really really want to keep them, at least replace
these 2 lines with just a "Uses polling\n" which gives the same info. Also
the 2 consecutive dev_dbg() may mix with other logging, making it awkward
to read in the logs.

Luca

--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Reply via email to