On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 11:06 PM Gideon Adjei <[email protected]> wrote: > > Replace udelay() calls >= 100us with usleep_range() to avoid busy-waiting. > > The delays are used in init_display() callbacks. These callbacks are > invoked by fbtft_probe_common() during the driver's probe path. the > probe path runs in process context which already uses sleeping APIs. > This makes usleep_range() safe to use in these situations.
Nice, now can we switch to modern API, i.e. fsleep()? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
