> IDK. My take would have been to provide the coreboot table under
> /sys/firmware; similar to DT. And then walk over it and create devices
> for the known entries.

We have established userspace infrastructure relying on the current
sysfs layout (at least the `cbmem-XXXXXXXX` nodes), so while you may
be right that there may have been better approaches to do this to
begin with, I would much prefer if we can stick with what's there now.

> I have a new iteration of the series that creates a coreboot-framebuffer
> platform device for at the same place that currently creates the
> simple-framebuffer device (in framebuffer_probe()). So we can leave most
> of the code it as. There are also a number of bugs that this is going to
> fix. I'll post it soon.

Sounds good, thanks!

Reply via email to