On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:50:54 +0100, "Uwe Kleine-König" <[email protected]> said: > There is little sense in having gpio-mvebu and pwm-backlight explicitly > listed in the PWM entry. Drop these and add the keywords that actually > identify a driver as PWM related. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 5b11839cba9d..1ab3b6a2c29b 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -21070,16 +21070,14 @@ L: [email protected] > S: Maintained > Q: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pwm/list/ > T: git https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git > -F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mvebu.yaml > F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ > F: Documentation/driver-api/pwm.rst > -F: drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c > F: drivers/pwm/ > -F: drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c > F: include/dt-bindings/pwm/ > F: include/linux/pwm.h > -F: include/linux/pwm_backlight.h > K: pwm_(config|apply_might_sleep|apply_atomic|ops) > +K: (devm_)?pwmchip_(add|alloc|remove) > +K: pwm_(round|get|set)_waveform > > PWM SUBSYSTEM BINDINGS [RUST] > M: Michal Wilczynski <[email protected]> > > base-commit: 8f0b4cce4481fb22653697cced8d0d04027cb1e8 > -- > 2.47.3 > >
Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
