This series provides an immediate mode GPUVM implementation.

Only immediate mode is provided for Rust code, as all planned Rust
drivers intend to use GPUVM in immediate mode.

Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v3:
- C prerequisites have landed, so only Rust part is present.
- The logic for drm_exec was removed, and is for a follow-up.
- Split up into patches.
- Add lifetime to SmStepContext.
- Docs filled out.
- Mutex abstractions used for GEM gpuva lock.
- Drop 'shared data' concept for now. (Can be added back later if required.)
- Rename 'core' field to 'data'.
- GpuVmCore<T> now derefs to GpuVm<T> instead of T.
- Renamed GpuVmBoObtain to GpuVmBoResident.
- Probably more changes I forgot.
- Link to v2: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Changes in v2:
- For this version, only the C prerequisites are included. Rust will be
  sent as follow-up.
- Add comment to drm_gpuvm_bo_destroy_not_in_lists()
- Add Fixes: tag.
- Pick up Reviewed-by tags.
- Link to v1: 
https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

---
Alice Ryhl (4):
      rust: gpuvm: add GpuVm::obtain()
      rust: gpuvm: add GpuVa struct
      rust: gpuvm: add GpuVmCore::sm_unmap()
      rust: gpuvm: add GpuVmCore::sm_map()

Asahi Lina (2):
      rust: drm: add base GPUVM immediate mode abstraction
      rust: helpers: Add bindings/wrappers for dma_resv_lock

 MAINTAINERS                     |   2 +
 rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h |   2 +
 rust/helpers/dma-resv.c         |  13 ++
 rust/helpers/drm_gpuvm.c        |  18 ++
 rust/helpers/helpers.c          |   2 +
 rust/kernel/drm/gpuvm/mod.rs    | 299 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 rust/kernel/drm/gpuvm/sm_ops.rs | 408 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 rust/kernel/drm/gpuvm/va.rs     | 148 +++++++++++++++
 rust/kernel/drm/gpuvm/vm_bo.rs  | 227 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 rust/kernel/drm/mod.rs          |   1 +
 10 files changed, 1120 insertions(+)
---
base-commit: 263e9ef3f5736697483af66babb8bc72f145b3f4
change-id: 20251128-gpuvm-rust-b719cac27ad6

Best regards,
-- 
Alice Ryhl <[email protected]>

Reply via email to