On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 09:58:26PM +0530, KrishnaAgarwal1308 wrote:
> Fix checkpatch warning by adding identity modifier for 
> define_fbtft_write_reg().
> No functional change.
> 

This commit does two things.  It introduces fbtft_identity()
and it flips the if (ret < 0) condition around to avoid the goto
inside a macro.  Only the first change is mentioned in the commit
message.

I have see the fbtft_identity() approach before and I don't like it.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
The name identity() doesn't mean anything.  It's a real word and
it has a meaning but it doesn't have a meaning which is at all
related to this code.

I think I would be okay with this the macro were called nop_endian()
or cpu_to_cpu_endian() or something.  Or another approach is to just
leave the code as-is.  Or maybe we could add a comment?

Regarding the flipped condition, the new code is badly formatted and
uglier than the original.  I would prefer to leave it as-is.

regards,
dan carpenter

Reply via email to