On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 2:56 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 06/02/2026 10:49, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 11:08 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 05/02/2026 21:31, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 5:07 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 07:15:45PM +0800, Hongyang Zhao wrote:
> >>>>> The LT9611 has two DSI input ports (Port A and Port B). Update the
> >>>>> binding to clearly document the port mapping and allow using Port B
> >>>>> alone when DSI is physically connected to Port B only.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Changes:
> >>>>> - Clarify port@0 corresponds to DSI Port A input
> >>>>> - Clarify port@1 corresponds to DSI Port B input
> >>>>> - Change port requirement from mandatory port@0 to anyOf port@0/port@1,
> >>>>>   allowing either port to be used independently
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Hongyang Zhao <[email protected]>
> >>>>> Reviewed-by: Roger Shimizu <[email protected]>
> >>>>
> >>>> Where did this review happen? V1 had this tag, but the patch was
> >>>> completely different, which means you were supposed to drop the tag.
> >>>> Please perform review in public.
> >>>
> >>> FYI. v2 was updated per review feedback, which is public:
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> >>
> >> Link above is not from Roger, so again - where did the review leading to
> >> above tag happen?
> >
> > Per feedback of v1, v2 was quite different than v1.
> > For v2, it's close to initial review, because it looks like a new patch.
>
> Where was the review of v2 given?
>
> The patch is entirely different. I already said it. I also said what is
> expected in such case. It is also documented:
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

Thanks for the guide!
Yes, v2 was reviewed in private. I'll inform Hongyang to remove the
tag when he sends the next series.

-Roger

Reply via email to