On 25-02-2026 16:49, Arunpravin Paneer Selvam wrote:
Reviewed-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <[email protected]>

Thanks for your prompt review, Arun!

-Sanjay


On 2/24/2026 6:55 PM, Sanjay Yadav wrote:
Introduce gpu_buddy_assert(), a small helper that wraps WARN_ON() and,
when CONFIG_KUNIT is enabled, also calls kunit_fail_current_test() so
that any active KUnit test is marked as failed. In non-KUnit builds
the macro reduces to WARN_ON(), preserving existing behaviour.

Stringify the asserted condition in the failure message to make it easy
to identify which assertion fired. Leave the WARN_ON() in
gpu_buddy_block_trim() unchanged, as it returns -EINVAL and the caller
already observes the failure via the return code.

Cc: Christian König <[email protected]>
Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Matthew Auld <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sanjay Yadav <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/gpu/buddy.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/buddy.c
index b27761246d4b..da5a1222f46b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/buddy.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/buddy.c
@@ -3,8 +3,7 @@
   * Copyright © 2021 Intel Corporation
   */
  -#include <kunit/test-bug.h>
-
+#include <linux/bug.h>
  #include <linux/export.h>
  #include <linux/kmemleak.h>
  #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -12,6 +11,28 @@
    #include <linux/gpu_buddy.h>
  +/**
+ * gpu_buddy_assert - assert a condition in the buddy allocator
+ * @condition: condition expected to be true
+ *
+ * When CONFIG_KUNIT is enabled, evaluates @condition and, if false, triggers + * a WARN_ON() and also calls kunit_fail_current_test() so that any running + * kunit test is properly marked as failed. The stringified condition is
+ * included in the failure message for easy identification.
+ *
+ * When CONFIG_KUNIT is not enabled, this reduces to WARN_ON() so production
+ * builds retain the same warning semantics as before.
+ */
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT)
+#include <kunit/test-bug.h>
+#define gpu_buddy_assert(condition) do { \
+    if (WARN_ON(!(condition)))                        \
+        kunit_fail_current_test("gpu_buddy_assert(" #condition ")");    \
+} while (0)
+#else
+#define gpu_buddy_assert(condition) WARN_ON(!(condition))
+#endif
+
  static struct kmem_cache *slab_blocks;
    static unsigned int
@@ -268,8 +289,8 @@ static int __force_merge(struct gpu_buddy *mm,
                  if (!gpu_buddy_block_is_free(buddy))
                      continue;
  -                WARN_ON(gpu_buddy_block_is_clear(block) ==
-                    gpu_buddy_block_is_clear(buddy));
+ gpu_buddy_assert(gpu_buddy_block_is_clear(block) !=
+                         gpu_buddy_block_is_clear(buddy));
                    /*
                   * Advance to the next node when the current node is the buddy,
@@ -415,8 +436,7 @@ void gpu_buddy_fini(struct gpu_buddy *mm)
          start = gpu_buddy_block_offset(mm->roots[i]);
          __force_merge(mm, start, start + size, order);
  -        if (WARN_ON(!gpu_buddy_block_is_free(mm->roots[i])))
-            kunit_fail_current_test("buddy_fini() root");
+ gpu_buddy_assert(gpu_buddy_block_is_free(mm->roots[i]));
            gpu_block_free(mm, mm->roots[i]);
  @@ -424,7 +444,7 @@ void gpu_buddy_fini(struct gpu_buddy *mm)
          size -= root_size;
      }
  -    WARN_ON(mm->avail != mm->size);
+    gpu_buddy_assert(mm->avail == mm->size);
        for_each_free_tree(i)
          kfree(mm->free_trees[i]);
@@ -541,7 +561,7 @@ static void __gpu_buddy_free_list(struct gpu_buddy *mm,
  {
      struct gpu_buddy_block *block, *on;
  -    WARN_ON(mark_dirty && mark_clear);
+    gpu_buddy_assert(!(mark_dirty && mark_clear));
        list_for_each_entry_safe(block, on, objects, link) {
          if (mark_clear)

Reply via email to