On Wed, 25 Feb 2026 at 17:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 25/02/2026 16:29, Yedaya Katsman wrote: > >>> + vddio-supply: true > >>> + ldo-supply: true > >> > >> LDO is the name of the type of regulator. Why is it called as name of > >> the supply? > > Can you explain more what you mean? Do you mean to change the name of > > the property? It seems that all the regulator properties are named > > foo-supply. > > I just have doubts that the device has supplied called LDO, considering > what LDO means. OK. I don't really have a way to verify if it's true, all I have is the downstream dts which calls it LDO [0]
[0] https://github.com/MiCode/Xiaomi_Kernel_OpenSource/blob/d3766fc8cda2d96de2850faa9ce58e5a37ea9f9c/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/trinket-sde-display.dtsi#L24-L36 > > > >> Isn't this binding exactly the same as s6e3ha8, s6e8aa5x01, sofef00 or > >> any others? > > Yeah they follow the same pattern. Is there something missing in this > > one? I will add descriptions to foo-supply properties > > No, was rather thinking that this should be combined into other binding, > assuming the actual pins and supplies are the same. Got it. I don't see any bindings that have the exact same set of supply regulators, at least according to their names. I guess I could add the regulators for this one to one of them and make the not-common regulators non-required, but I don't know if that's what you had in mind. > Best regards, > Krzysztof Thanks, Yedaya
