On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com> > wrote: >> No need to assign the same copy callback for both >> copy blit and dma. > > This used to confuse the benchmark code if memory serves, if thats > fixed then I'm okay with this. >
The benchmark code checks if the copy_dma function pointer is valid before attempting to use it. Alex > Dave. >