Hey,

Den 2026-03-21 kl. 20:27, skrev Tejun Heo:
> Hello,
> 
> Generally looks okay to me. One comment on 3/3 — the naked xchg() in
> set_resource_max() needs a comment explaining why it's used instead of
> page_counter_set_max() and what the semantics are (unconditionally sets max
> regardless of current usage to prevent further allocations, since there's no
> eviction mechanism yet).
> 
> Applied 1/3. Maarten, Michal, what do you think?

Yeah probably drop 2/3 too since there is no longer a case where setting a 
limit may fail.

Kind regards,
~Maarten Lankhorst

Reply via email to