Currently the panthor_vm_lock_region() function will implicitly expand
an already locked VM region. This can be problematic because the caller
do not reliably know if it needs to call panthor_vm_unlock_region()
or not.

Worth noting, there is currently no known issues with this as the code
is written today.

This change introduces panthor_vm_expand_region() which will only work
if there is already a locked VM region. This again means that the
original lock and unlock functions can work as a pair. This pairing is
needed for subsequent protected memory changes.

Signed-off-by: Ketil Johnsen <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c
index 1f6b9242279c2..b82b01013611c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_mmu.c
@@ -1774,20 +1774,49 @@ static const char *access_type_name(struct 
panthor_device *ptdev,
        }
 }
 
+static int panthor_vm_apply_as_lock(struct panthor_vm *vm, u64 region)
+{
+       struct panthor_device *ptdev = vm->ptdev;
+
+       lockdep_assert_held(&ptdev->mmu->as.slots_lock);
+
+       gpu_write64(ptdev->mmu->iomem, AS_LOCKADDR(vm->as.id), region);
+       return as_send_cmd_and_wait(ptdev, vm->as.id, AS_COMMAND_LOCK);
+}
+
 static int panthor_vm_lock_region(struct panthor_vm *vm, u64 start, u64 size)
 {
        struct panthor_device *ptdev = vm->ptdev;
        int ret = 0;
 
-       /* sm_step_remap() can call panthor_vm_lock_region() to account for
-        * the wider unmap needed when doing a partial huge page unamp. We
-        * need to ignore the lock if it's already part of the locked region.
-        */
-       if (start >= vm->locked_region.start &&
-           start + size <= vm->locked_region.start + vm->locked_region.size)
-               return 0;
+       if (drm_WARN_ON(&ptdev->base, vm->locked_region.size))
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       mutex_lock(&ptdev->mmu->as.slots_lock);
+       if (vm->as.id >= 0 && size) {
+               u64 region = pack_region_range(ptdev, &start, &size);
+
+               ret = panthor_vm_apply_as_lock(vm, region);
+       }
 
-       /* sm_step_remap() may need a locked region that isn't a strict superset
+       if (!ret) {
+               vm->locked_region.start = start;
+               vm->locked_region.size = size;
+       }
+       mutex_unlock(&ptdev->mmu->as.slots_lock);
+
+       return ret;
+}
+
+static int panthor_vm_expand_locked_region(struct panthor_vm *vm,
+                                          u64 start, u64 size)
+{
+       struct panthor_device *ptdev = vm->ptdev;
+       u64 end;
+       int ret = 0;
+
+       /* This function is here to handle the following case:
+        * sm_step_remap() may need a locked region that isn't a strict superset
         * of the original one because of having to extend unmap boundaries 
beyond
         * it to deal with partial unmaps of transparent huge pages. What we 
want
         * in those cases is to lock the union of both regions. The new region 
must
@@ -1795,25 +1824,30 @@ static int panthor_vm_lock_region(struct panthor_vm 
*vm, u64 start, u64 size)
         * boundaries in a remap operation can only shift up or down 
respectively,
         * but never otherwise.
         */
-       if (vm->locked_region.size) {
-               u64 end = max(vm->locked_region.start + vm->locked_region.size,
-                             start + size);
 
-               drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&vm->ptdev->base, (start + size <= 
vm->locked_region.start) ||
-                                (start >= vm->locked_region.start + 
vm->locked_region.size));
+       /* This function can only expand an already locked region */
+       if (drm_WARN_ON(&ptdev->base, !vm->locked_region.size))
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       /* Early out if requested range is already locked */
+       if (start >= vm->locked_region.start &&
+           start + size <= vm->locked_region.start + vm->locked_region.size)
+               return 0;
 
-               start = min(start, vm->locked_region.start);
-               size = end - start;
-       }
+       end = max(vm->locked_region.start + vm->locked_region.size,
+                 start + size);
+
+       drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&ptdev->base, (start + size <= 
vm->locked_region.start) ||
+                        (start >= vm->locked_region.start + 
vm->locked_region.size));
+
+       start = min(start, vm->locked_region.start);
+       size = end - start;
 
        mutex_lock(&ptdev->mmu->as.slots_lock);
        if (vm->as.id >= 0 && size) {
-               /* Lock the region that needs to be updated */
-               gpu_write64(ptdev->mmu->iomem, AS_LOCKADDR(vm->as.id),
-                           pack_region_range(ptdev, &start, &size));
+               u64 region = pack_region_range(ptdev, &start, &size);
 
-               /* If the lock succeeded, update the locked_region info. */
-               ret = as_send_cmd_and_wait(ptdev, vm->as.id, AS_COMMAND_LOCK);
+               ret = panthor_vm_apply_as_lock(vm, region);
        }
 
        if (!ret) {
@@ -2367,11 +2401,14 @@ static int panthor_gpuva_sm_step_remap(struct 
drm_gpuva_op *op,
                 */
                unmap_hugepage_align(&op->remap, &unmap_start, &unmap_range);
 
-               /* If the range changed, we might have to lock a wider region 
to guarantee
-                * atomicity. panthor_vm_lock_region() bails out early if the 
new region
-                * is already part of the locked region, so no need to do this 
check here.
+               /* If the range changed, we might have to lock a wider region to
+                * guarantee atomicity.
                 */
-               panthor_vm_lock_region(vm, unmap_start, unmap_range);
+               ret = panthor_vm_expand_locked_region(vm, unmap_start,
+                                                     unmap_range);
+               if (ret)
+                       return ret;
+
                panthor_vm_unmap_pages(vm, unmap_start, unmap_range);
        }
 
-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to