Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) 
to consider:

New issues:
- [High] The vdec_recycle_thread is conditionally skipped from being stopped 
but its resources are unconditionally freed during a partial STREAMOFF, leading 
to Use-After-Free and list corruption.
- [High] Failing start_streaming with -EBUSY permanently leaks streamon flags, 
causing state inconsistency and cross-session hardware corruption.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The return value of `kthread_run()` is not checked, leading to a 
kernel crash when `kthread_stop()` is called on an `ERR_PTR`.
- [High] vdec_reset_timestamps accesses the timestamps list without holding 
ts_spinlock, leading to list corruption.
- [High] Missing cancel_work_sync for esparser_queue_work causes UAF and 
unclocked register access.
--

--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v7 02/19] media: meson: vdec: Fix STREAMON / STREAMOFF 
race conditions and session teardown ---
commit c8f8b26e4a120933b5b1d329b3cc6e97ea21778d
Author: Anand Moon <[email protected]>
Subject: media: meson: vdec: Fix STREAMON / STREAMOFF race conditions and 
session teardown

This commit addresses race conditions during concurrent STREAMON / STREAMOFF
calls and dynamic resolution changes. It restructures initialization paths,
error handling, and state tracking to prevent hardware state corruption.

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/vdec.c 
> b/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/vdec.c
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/vdec.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/meson/vdec/vdec.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -308,9 +303,29 @@ static int vdec_start_streaming(struct vb2_queue *q, 
> unsigned int count)
>       }
>  
>       if (sess->status == STATUS_RUNNING ||
> -         sess->status == STATUS_NEEDS_RESUME ||
> -         sess->status == STATUS_INIT)
> +         sess->status == STATUS_NEEDS_RESUME)
>               return 0;
>  
> +     /*
> +      * Secure the core hardware lock before checking availability
> +      * and updating session states to prevent STREAMON race conditions.
> +      */
> +     mutex_lock(&core->lock);
> +     if (core->cur_sess && core->cur_sess != sess) {
> +             ret = -EBUSY;
> +             mutex_unlock(&core->lock);
> +             goto err_unlock_no_hw;
> +     }

[Severity: High]
If we jump to err_unlock_no_hw here, doesn't it bypass the
err_cleanup_session label that clears the streamon flags?

If session B calls VIDIOC_STREAMON on its OUTPUT queue and hits this path,
sess->streamon_out will remain 1.

Could a subsequent VIDIOC_QBUF from session B cause vdec_vb2_buf_queue to
schedule esparser_queue_work, potentially overwriting the active hardware
registers of the current session?

[ ... ]

>       sess->sequence_cap = 0;
>       sess->sequence_out = 0;
> +
>       if (vdec_codec_needs_recycle(sess))
>               sess->recycle_thread = kthread_run(vdec_recycle_thread, sess,
>                                                  "vdec_recycle");

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code properly handle thread
creation failure?

If kthread_run fails due to memory constraints, it returns an ERR_PTR.
Later in vdec_stop_streaming, this pointer is passed unconditionally to
kthread_stop.

Could this cause a kernel panic when kthread_stop attempts to dereference
the ERR_PTR?

> -     sess->status = STATUS_INIT;
> -     core->cur_sess = sess;
>       schedule_work(&sess->esparser_queue_work);
>       return 0;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does closing the file descriptor safely
clean up the workqueue scheduled here?

When the client queues a buffer and then closes the file descriptor,
vdec_close destroys mutexes and frees the amvdec_session memory via kfree
without cancelling the pending esparser_queue_work.

When the workqueue executes vdec_esparser_queue_work, could it access the
freed session memory and attempt to take a destroyed mutex?

[ ... ]

> @@ -399,30 +424,13 @@ static void vdec_stop_streaming(struct vb2_queue *q)

[ ... ]

> +     if (full_cleanup) {
> +             if ((q->type != V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE ||
> +                  !sess->streamon_out) && vdec_codec_needs_recycle(sess)) {
> +                     kthread_stop(sess->recycle_thread);
> +             }
> +
> +             vdec_poweroff(sess);

[Severity: High]
If a userspace client starts streaming on both queues and then calls
VIDIOC_STREAMOFF on the CAPTURE queue, the newly added condition evaluating
q->type != V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE or !sess->streamon_out
will evaluate to false, skipping kthread_stop.

Since full_cleanup is true, the code proceeds to tear down resources via
vdec_reset_bufs_recycle and kfree of sess->priv.

Could this lead to a use-after-free or list corruption if the recycle thread
continues executing while its backing resources are freed?

> +             vdec_free_canvas(sess);
> +
> +             if (sess->vififo_vaddr) {
> +                     dma_free_coherent(sess->core->dev, sess->vififo_size,
> +                                       sess->vififo_vaddr, 
> sess->vififo_paddr);
> +                     sess->vififo_vaddr = NULL;
> +                     sess->vififo_paddr = 0;
> +             }
> +
> +             vdec_reset_timestamps(sess);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does vdec_reset_timestamps safely access
the timestamps list here?

The function iterates and frees elements of the sess->timestamps list
without holding ts_spinlock.

If a concurrent threaded ISR executes amvdec_dst_buf_done_idx and calls
amvdec_remove_ts, it will acquire ts_spinlock and attempt to remove an
element.

Could this race condition lead to linked list corruption and use-after-free?

> +             vdec_reset_bufs_recycle(sess);
> +             core->cur_sess = NULL;
> +
> +             kfree(sess->priv);
> +             sess->priv = NULL;
> +     } else {
> +             if (sess->status == STATUS_NEEDS_RESUME)
> +                     sess->changed_format = 0;
> +     }
> +     mutex_unlock(&core->lock);
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review ยท 
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=2

Reply via email to