Remove unnecessary min_t()/max_t() usage in ivpu_fw.c
and ivpu_mmu_context.c. The min()/max() macros are
sufficient as the types are compatible and
there is no risk of overflow.

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Kacprowski <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c          | 2 +-
 drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu_context.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c
index 5a8f7dfb54e6..b78b7c35cd9b 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_fw.c
@@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int ivpu_fw_parse(struct ivpu_device *vdev)
        fw->shave_nn_size = PAGE_ALIGN(fw_hdr->shave_nn_fw_size);
        fw->cold_boot_entry_point = fw_hdr->entry_point;
 
-       fw->trace_level = min_t(u32, ivpu_fw_log_level, IVPU_FW_LOG_FATAL);
+       fw->trace_level = min(ivpu_fw_log_level, IVPU_FW_LOG_FATAL);
        fw->trace_destination_mask = VPU_TRACE_DESTINATION_VERBOSE_TRACING;
        fw->trace_hw_component_mask = -1;
 
diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu_context.c 
b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu_context.c
index c4014c83e727..bb3ca81838e3 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu_context.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_mmu_context.c
@@ -588,8 +588,8 @@ void ivpu_mmu_context_init(struct ivpu_device *vdev, struct 
ivpu_mmu_context *ct
                start = vdev->hw->ranges.runtime.start;
                end = vdev->hw->ranges.shave.end;
        } else {
-               start = min_t(u64, vdev->hw->ranges.user.start, 
vdev->hw->ranges.shave.start);
-               end = max_t(u64, vdev->hw->ranges.user.end, 
vdev->hw->ranges.dma.end);
+               start = min(vdev->hw->ranges.user.start, 
vdev->hw->ranges.shave.start);
+               end = max(vdev->hw->ranges.user.end, vdev->hw->ranges.dma.end);
        }
 
        drm_mm_init(&ctx->mm, start, end - start);
-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to