On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 10:12:56AM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 10:59:56AM +0200, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote: > > On 7/15/26 19:14, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2026 09:39:37 -0700 Stanislav Kinsburskii > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >>> > > >>> Please don't do this, this is completely impossible to track for review > > >>> :) > > >>> > > >>> mm review is currently very difficult based on volumes, it'll become > > >>> impossible > > >>> to manage if people sound fragments of series. > > >>> > > >>> Please just resend the whole thing at this point. > > >>> > > >> > > >> Well, I followed the guidance provided by Andrew, and I believe he > > >> applied all of the changes, including these, to the `mm` tree. > > >> > > >> Do you still want me to send v9 under these circumstances? > > > > > > Sure, if that's what reviewers prefer. > > > > > > This is a bit unfriendly to people who have already reviewed the code. > > > Which is one of the reasons why I respond to a new version with a > > > single diff showing reviewers (and the author, and myself) what changed > > > since the previous version. > > > > As much as I dislike fixup patches, I tolerate them in reply to the > > existing series. > > > > But having some random fixup series is just crazy, really. > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > > > David > > Yes. > > Stanislav - also see Jason's suggestion - if you give a base commit then > sashiko > seems to work better. Maybe look at using b4 which does all of this for you > automatically? >
Sure. Thank you all for the suggestions. I'll use b4 next time. Thanks, Stanislav > Thanks, Lorenzo
