Some lil nitpicks

On Wed, 2026-07-15 at 01:14 +0400, Mohamed Ahmed wrote:
> +     case NVKM_GSP_RUSD_ROWREMAP_HIST_MAX ... 
> NVKM_GSP_RUSD_ROWREMAP_FAILURE: {
> +             RUSD_MEM_ROW_REMAP remap;
> +
> +             ret = r570_rusd_read_section(gsp,
> +                                          offsetof(NV00DE_SHARED_DATA, 
> memRowRemap),
> +                                          sizeof(remap), &remap);
> +             if (ret)
> +                     return ret;
> +
> +             switch (item) {
> +             case NVKM_GSP_RUSD_ROWREMAP_HIST_MAX:
> +                     *val = remap.info.histogramMax;
> +                     break;
> +             case NVKM_GSP_RUSD_ROWREMAP_HIST_HIGH:
> +                     *val = remap.info.histogramHigh;
> +                     break;
> +             case NVKM_GSP_RUSD_ROWREMAP_HIST_PARTIAL:
> +                     *val = remap.info.histogramPartial;
> +                     break;
> +             case NVKM_GSP_RUSD_ROWREMAP_HIST_LOW:
> +                     *val = remap.info.histogramLow;
> +                     break;
> +             case NVKM_GSP_RUSD_ROWREMAP_HIST_NONE:
> +                     *val = remap.info.histogramNone;
> +                     break;
> +             case NVKM_GSP_RUSD_ROWREMAP_CORRECTABLE:
> +                     *val = remap.info.correctableRows;
> +                     break;
> +             case NVKM_GSP_RUSD_ROWREMAP_UNCORRECTABLE:
> +                     *val = remap.info.uncorrectableRows;
> +                     break;
> +             case NVKM_GSP_RUSD_ROWREMAP_PENDING:
> +                     *val = remap.info.isPending;
> +                     break;
> +             default: /* NVKM_GSP_RUSD_ROWREMAP_FAILURE */
> +                     *val = remap.info.hasFailureOccurred;
> +                     break;

Maybe this should be an explicit case instead of default, so we can
drm_WARN_ON_ONCE unknown values?

> +             }
> +             return 0;
> +     }
> +     case NVKM_GSP_RUSD_PCIE_GEN ... 
> NVKM_GSP_RUSD_PCIE_UNSUPPORTED_REQUESTS: {
> +             RUSD_PCIE_DATA pcie;
> +
> +             int idx = item - NVKM_GSP_RUSD_PCIE_GEN;
> +
> +             ret = r570_rusd_read_section(gsp,
> +                                          offsetof(NV00DE_SHARED_DATA, 
> pciBusData),
> +                                          sizeof(pcie), &pcie);
> +             if (ret)
> +                     return ret;
> +
> +             *val = pcie.info.data[idx];
> +             return 0;
> +     }
> +     default:
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +
> +     /* A reading of 0 mW is indistinguishable from "not supported on this
> +      * board" (e.g. module power on Ampere/Hopper).
> +      */
> +     if (!mw)
> +             return -ENODATA;
> +
> +     *val = (s64)mw * 1000;
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +const struct nvkm_rm_api_rusd
> +r570_rusd = {
> +     .init = r570_rusd_init,
> +     .resume = r570_rusd_resume,
> +     .read = r570_rusd_read,
> +};
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/rm.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/rm.h
> index a9af94adf9ef..1338b4a88f95 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/rm.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/rm.h
> @@ -130,6 +130,12 @@ struct nvkm_rm_api {
>                       void (*fini)(struct r535_gr *);
>               } scrubber;
>       } *gr;
> +
> +     const struct nvkm_rm_api_rusd {
> +             int (*init)(struct nvkm_gsp *);
> +             void (*resume)(struct nvkm_gsp *);
> +             int (*read)(struct nvkm_gsp *, enum nvkm_gsp_rusd_item, s64 *);
> +     } *rusd;
>  };
>  
>  extern const struct nvkm_rm_impl r535_rm_tu102;
> @@ -188,4 +194,5 @@ extern const struct nvkm_rm_api_gr r570_gr;
>  int r570_gr_gpc_mask(struct nvkm_gsp *, u32 *mask);
>  int r570_gr_tpc_mask(struct nvkm_gsp *, int gpc, u32 *mask);
>  extern const struct nvkm_rm_api_engine r570_ofa;
> +extern const struct nvkm_rm_api_rusd r570_rusd;
>  #endif

Reply via email to