A correction to my own message above, before it stands uncorrected in the archive.
I wrote that the two test reports cover "the two NanoPC-T6 variants besides my own board". That is wrong, and it misattributes Sidong's work. Sidong tested on a Radxa ROCK 5B+, not on a NanoPC-T6: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Diederik's report is the one covering the two NanoPC-T6 variants. So the coverage is three boards besides mine, on three different designs: Tested-by: Sidong Yang <[email protected]> # Radxa ROCK 5B+ Tested-by: Diederik de Haas <[email protected]> # NanoPC-T6 LTS, NanoPC-T6 Plus Apologies to Sidong for getting his hardware wrong - his report was the more thorough of the two, with clk_summary before and after, 90 runtime PM cycles across the three cores, and bit-exact inference results, and it deserved to be quoted accurately. Nothing else in that message changes. Igor
