On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:11:57 -0700 Keith Packard <keithp at keithp.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:56:39 +0100, Chris Wilson <chris at > chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > > > Ah, now I see why we moved from using the active configuration earlier. ;-) > > My evil plan is revealed! > > > Doesn't this prevent us from ever using SSC though, as virtually every > > single PCH machine has HDMI encoders that haven't been masked out through > > the chicken fuses or VBT? > > That wasn't my intent -- the SSC source gets modulated whenever the VBT > table says it can, so when the panel uses the SSC source, it will get > SSC. Did I mess something up here? Or is it just some interaction with > the mode setting code that I didn't get right? Assuming we're selecting the proper reference clock in the PLL selection code anyway... Doing it all up front seems nicer; did you get confirmation that the "wavy VGA" bug was fixed with this series? Overall seems like a good improvement over our old PCH refclk code... -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
