On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 11:25:06AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 02:01:20PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 12:13:28PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 08:09:11PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 06:38:58PM +0300, Konstantin Sinyuk wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 12:32:22PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > <...> > > > > > > The wording alone is not sufficient. Your proposal should be backed by > > > > real devices representing different architectures from different > > > > vendors. > > > > > > Future Intel (and other vendors) hardware will include UALink. > > > > I guess that, like most of us, you are not authorized to discuss or > > comment on Intel's non-public roadmap. Can you point to any public > > commitment from Intel to implement UALink in its devices? > > That's the only public support commitment you will find for now: > > https://ualinkconsortium.org/blog/intel-supports-ualink-for-scale-up-networking-829/ > > as an active member of the consortium > https://ualinkconsortium.org/members/
I saw that PR article, but I couldn't find anything on the Internet stating that "future Intel (or other vendors') hardware will include UALink." So, for now, this RFC can be considered an academic project. Thanks
