On 13.09.2026 09:31, [email protected] wrote:
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s)
to consider:
- [Low] Vendor prefix mismatch: 'shenchao' mapped to 'Shenzhen Zhuohong
Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.'
--
commit 73f96d396aaa9d9d8dc1a660e32b98910c8690b8
Author: Alexey Minnekhanov <[email protected]>
dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add Shenzhen Zhuohong Electronic
This commit adds a new vendor prefix to the device tree bindings. It aims
to register Shenzhen Zhuohong Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., a
manufacturer of LCD/IPS displays.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
@@ -1507,6 +1507,8 @@ patternProperties:
description: SGX Sensortech
"^sharp,.*":
description: Sharp Corporation
+ "^shenchao,.*":
+ description: Shenzhen Zhuohong Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.
[Severity: Low]
Is this vendor prefix mapped to the correct company description?
The patch introduces the 'shenchao' prefix, but maps it to Shenzhen Zhuohong
Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Since 'shenchao' typically refers to a
Shenchao panel (as seen in a subsequent commit introducing the
'shenchao,fhdplus-video' panel), mapping it to Zhuohong, a different panel
manufacturer, could cause confusion for device tree authors.
Should this prefix be named something like '^zhuohong,.*' instead to match
the manufacturer, or should the description be updated to reflect the actual
Shenchao company name?
It is very hard to find anything about this manufacturer. All we know:
in vendor kernel they use shenchao prefix and they produce LCDs.
But I think I've found some information, so this will be fixed in v2.
--
Regards,
Alexey Minnekhanov
