On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Ilija Hadzic <ihadzic at research.bell-labs.com> wrote: > the crtc check in radeon_get_vblank_timestamp_kms should be against > the num_crtc field in radeon_device not against num_crtcs in drm_device
This more correct, but would there ever be a case where they are different? Alex Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com> > > Signed-off-by: Ilija Hadzic <ihadzic at research.bell-labs.com> > --- > ?drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c | ? ?2 +- > ?1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c > index a749c26..540a9ee 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c > @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ int radeon_get_vblank_timestamp_kms(struct drm_device > *dev, int crtc, > ? ? ? ?struct drm_crtc *drmcrtc; > ? ? ? ?struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private; > > - ? ? ? if (crtc < 0 || crtc >= dev->num_crtcs) { > + ? ? ? if (crtc < 0 || crtc >= rdev->num_crtc) { > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?DRM_ERROR("Invalid crtc %d\n", crtc); > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?return -EINVAL; > ? ? ? ?} > -- > 1.7.7 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel >