On Wed, Oct 07, 2026 at 01:56:44AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 04:36:50PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2026 at 12:22:27AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 02:29:55PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 02:55:08PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > > > PCI P2PDMA applies Request and Completion Redirect throughout both > > > > > paths. > > > > > This misclassifies asymmetric and nested switches, and reports one > > > > > answer > > > > > for every kind of TLP. > > > > > > > > > > Three ACS controls act on TLP attributes the client chooses rather > > > > > than > > > > > on the topology: Translation Blocking and Direct Translated P2P act on > > > > > a Request's Address Type, and Completion Redirect skips Completions > > > > > carrying > > > > > Relaxed Ordering. > > > > > > > > > > Evaluate each direction at the path divergence, decide every class > > > > > from the > > > > > one walk, and treat a client with ATS enabled as translating unless > > > > > its > > > > > driver declares per-mapping ATS. > > > > > > > > > > This completes the P2PDMA side; dma-buf and mlx5 follow separately. > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > Leon Romanovsky (18): > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Document the TLP attribute assumptions > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Derive routing from directional ACS controls > > > > > PCI: Reject unreadable ACS controls in isolation checks > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Evaluate ACS controls at the path divergence > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Document directional ACS routing > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Collect the path's ACS controls before deciding > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Answer routing per TLP class > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Route Relaxed Ordering Completions directly > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Reject Translated Requests blocked by Translation > > > > > Blocking > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Route Translated Requests under Direct Translated > > > > > P2P > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Log detailed ACS routing diagnostics > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Add KUnit tests for the ACS routing decisions > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Test the ACS P2P routing walk > > > > > PCI: Add KUnit coverage for ACS isolation checks > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Document TLP-class routing > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Let a client declare that it selects ATS per mapping > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Evaluate the ATS path for clients with ATS enabled > > > > > PCI/P2PDMA: Test the routing of clients with ATS enabled > > > > > > > > > > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 15 +- > > > > > Documentation/driver-api/pci/p2pdma.rst | 80 +++ > > > > > drivers/pci/Kconfig | 15 + > > > > > drivers/pci/Makefile | 1 + > > > > > drivers/pci/p2pdma.c | 719 > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++-- > > > > > drivers/pci/pci.c | 7 +- > > > > > drivers/pci/pci.h | 58 ++ > > > > > drivers/pci/pci_acs_test.c | 860 > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > drivers/pci/quirks.c | 6 +- > > > > > include/linux/pci-p2pdma.h | 12 +- > > > > > 10 files changed, 1687 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-) > > > > > --- > > > > > base-commit: 08dbfad3f5040f5bdb6c529da20d6d4e81fefd72 > > > > > change-id: 20260821-fix-p2p-acs-v4-0-e72455e3a261 > > > > > prerequisite-message-id: > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > prerequisite-patch-id: 6b25c7fcf164cdfc14e9fac5b908d97fcf6509d7 > > > > > prerequisite-patch-id: 0d083c281001365aae4b35544cf28891a6ab9a96 > > > > > prerequisite-patch-id: bfd9dabf271f3cc9a3a61f46387d20c20311363d > > > > > prerequisite-patch-id: fad0275efc722830fc591509506c0a5e4f581073 > > > > > prerequisite-patch-id: 0c83bee688fec1f6d1564654df7c630fa6a4a978 > > > > > > > > This seems like material for the PCI tree, but I'm not sure how to > > > > apply it. It doesn't apply cleanly on the current pci/p2pdma > > > > (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git/log/?h=p2pdma), > > > > which does contain your series from > > > > [email protected]. > > > > > > > > I could probably fix the conflicts but I don't know why there should > > > > be conflicts, since the only commits on pci/p2pdma other than yours > > > > are a few trivial allow-list updates. > > > > > > So maybe this is related to these trivial updates, my series was based > > > on the clean p2pdma branch: > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/leon/linux-rdma.git/log/?h=fix-p2p-acs-v9 > > > > Ah, yeah, it must be the allow-list additions that I have but you > > don't. I wouldn't have thought the offsets would have been a problem. > > It applies fine if I move the Haswell and Alibaba allowlist patches t > to the end so the base matches fix-p2p-acs-v9, thanks.
Bjorn, It is unclear to me if I should to resend. Thanks
