On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 09:35:37PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 05:49:53PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2026, at 16:23, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 09:53:47AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 05:25:08PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > >> > PCI P2PDMA applies Request and Completion Redirect throughout both > > >> > paths. > > >> > This misclassifies asymmetric and nested switches, and reports one > > >> > answer > > >> > for every kind of TLP. > > >> > > > >> > Three ACS controls act on TLP attributes the Requester chooses rather > > >> > than on the topology: Translation Blocking and Direct Translated P2P > > >> > act on > > >> > a Request's Address Type, and Completion Redirect skips Completions > > >> > carrying > > >> > Relaxed Ordering. > > >> > > > >> > Evaluate each direction at the path divergence, decide every class > > >> > from the > > >> > one walk, and treat a client with ATS enabled as translating unless its > > >> > driver declares per-mapping ATS. > > >> > > > >> > This completes the P2PDMA side; dma-buf and mlx5 follow separately. > > >> > > > >> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]> > > >> > --- > > >> > Changes in v11: > > >> > > >> > > >> Bjorn, > > >> > > >> Could you please save me from the AI-bot attack? Every rebase seems to > > >> uncover another bizarre pre-existing issue. It never ends. > > > > > > Can you elaborate? I'm not sure what you'd like me to do here. I > > > don't control the Sashiko reviews, and I thought Sashiko was recently > > > changed to put pre-existing issues in a database but not in the email > > > responses. > > > > AI reviews are not deterministic and every resubmission gives us slightly > > different result, which is in this phase of submission is full of > > hallucinated flows not applicable to the upstream. > > > > In addition to upstream Sashiko, i run everything through local one with > > slightly better models which hallucinating even more. > > > > I would ask you to merge the series so it gets real exposure in addition to > > my kunit and specific hw setup. > > Bjorn, > > We're in the merge window now, so I don't expect such a large series to be > merged. What about the next cycle? Should I send v12 after -rc1, or wait?
After -rc1 would be good.
