On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:57:05 -0700, Greg KH <greg at kroah.com> wrote:
> No, actually this makes it easier for -stable as each individual patch > fixes a problem, so in re-reading them, I have no objection for them to > go into -stable. Ok, cool. Splitting these up was a pain. > Would these also work on 3.0? They won't apply cleanly, but yes, they should be useful there. > > I'd rather have a 'regular' PC; getting Debian installed on this machine > > was no picnic. > > Due to UEFI stuff? Or something else? UEFI, the lack of CD booting, and the general 'Steve knows best' attitude of the hardware. > I agree, it is a very nice hardware form factor that no other > manufacturer can seem to duplicate for the same (well, any) price these > days. Yeah, PC vendors clearly aren't making hardware for us anymore. -- keith.packard at intel.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20110930/317e3161/attachment.pgp>