On Fri, Oct 30, 2026 at 11:42:12AM +0200, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > пт, 30 жовт. 2026 р. о 11:29 Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> пише: > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 05:28:59PM +0200, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > > > From: Mikko Perttunen <[email protected]> > > > > > > The MIPI DBI bus allows modeling DBI hosts and peripherals using the Linux > > > driver model. DBI hosts are registered by their respective drivers. During > > > registration, DBI peripherals are created from the device tree nodes > > > provided by the host. > > > > > > DBI hosts expose operations that can be used by peripheral drivers to > > > access associated devices. > > > > > > The original code was authored by Mikko Perttunen; I have aligned it with > > > the existing MIPI DSI implementation. > > > > > > Co-developed-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <[email protected]> > > > > The SoB situation isn't right here. The author is allegedly Mikko > > Perttunen, but you don't have their SoB, and yours isn't there either. > > This is up to Mikko to decide what to do.
Not only, no. When you're sending a patch you must add yours too. > > Aside from that, which MIPI-DBI type is this supposed to support, and > > how do you intend to support Type C panels we already support through > > SPI? > > > > MIPI-DBI Type A and B, which have NO support right now. Then you need to make it much clearer... everywhere :) Maxime
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
