On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 2:20 PM Alexander Koskovich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, October 29th, 2026 at 4:20 PM, Rob Clark 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +static struct adreno_snapshot_sect
> > +__snapshot_sect_init(struct adreno_gpu_state *state, uint16_t id, size_t 
> > extra_sz,
> > +                  void *sect_hdr, size_t sect_hdr_sz, const char *func, 
> > int line)
> > +{
> > +     /* A few section types have no section header: */
> > +     switch (id) {
> > +     case ADRENO_SNAPSHOT_SECTION_REGS_V2:
> > +             sect_hdr_sz = 0;
> > +     default:
> > +             break;
> > +     }
>
> Heads up that I'm seeing this warning when building with clang:
>
> In file included from ../drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a8xx_gpu_state.c:9:
> ../drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_snapshot.h:398:2: warning: unannotated 
> fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
>   398 |         default:
>       |         ^
> ../drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_snapshot.h:398:2: note: insert 'break;' 
> to avoid fall-through
>   398 |         default:
>       |         ^
>       |         break;

thx, fixed.. not sure why gcc didn't complain

BR,
-R

Reply via email to