On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 03:17:38PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 06:15:27PM +0200, ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com 
> wrote:
> > Another month, another massive atomic patchset.
> > 
> > I managed to clean up warts left over from the modeset-rework rebase,
> > but other than that I haven't really found the time to touch this too
> > much since the last time I posted patches from this set.
> > 
> > Seeing as my schedule isn't getting any less busy in the forseeable
> > future, it would be nice to get this monster merged sooner rather
> > than never.
> > 
> > Ever since the code started to resemble something sane, I've tried
> > to avoid squashing patches, just in case someone was actually trying
> > to follow what's changed. But clearly some of the patches can
> > be squashed, and that would probably allow some of the earlier ones
> > to be dropped entirely.
> > 
> > What's clearly needed is a test tool that will stresss the mode
> > setting side of the code more. My glplane test just changes the
> > modes in the beginning, and then just does flips and other plane
> > stuff. I'll try to get something done on that front before Christmas.
> > 
> > Repo is here:
> > https://gitorious.org/vsyrjala/linux/commits/drm_atomic_23
> > 
> > The repo also contains 64bit get_user() implementation for x86-32,
> > which I sent to lkml and x86 people for review. So this should now
> > be testable even on a 32bit system.
> 
> Can you please upload your testcase somewhere so that I can play around
> with this without too much hassle.

It's here:
https://gitorious.org/vsyrjala/glplane

It responds to a bunch of keys in some way. Look near the end of main()
in plane.c to see which keys do what.

You'll need libdrm too:
https://gitorious.org/vsyrjala/drm/commits/drm_atomic_7

And there's an older test here, but I'm not sure it works anymore:
https://gitorious.org/vsyrjala/plane

-- 
Ville Syrj?l?
Intel OTC

Reply via email to