Le 10/01/2012 06:39, Dan Carpenter a ?crit :
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:28:13AM +0100, Martin Peres wrote:
>> Le 04/01/2012 08:20, Dan Carpenter a ?crit :
>>> calc_mclk() returns zero on success and negative on failure but clk is
>>> a u32.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter<dan.carpenter at oracle.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_pm.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_pm.c
>>> index 0393721..3508de9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_pm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_pm.c
>>> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ nv50_pm_clocks_pre(struct drm_device *dev, struct
>>> nouveau_pm_level *perflvl)
>>> info->mclk_hwsq.len = 0;
>>> if (perflvl->memory) {
>>> clk = calc_mclk(dev, perflvl->memory,&info->mclk_hwsq);
>>> - if (clk< 0) {
>>> + if ((int)clk< 0) {
>>> ret = clk;
>>> goto error;
>>> }
>> Well spotted Dan!
>>
>> Sorry for the late answer, was busy reworking this file for safe reclocking.
>>
>> I have a slightly different fix for that. Please tell me if It suits
>> you:
>> https://gitorious.org/linux-nouveau-pm/linux-nouveau-pm/commit/c1b80360ezd1aa7dd780ac383aae9437c66ef3b89
> That link redirects to
> https://gitorious.org/linux-nouveau-pm/linux-nouveau-pm/commits/master
> and it doesn't show the patch.
>
> But I wasn't a huge fan of adding the cast very much either so I'm
> sure your patch is good.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
Sorry, here is the patch attached.
