On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:30:04AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 05:47:13PM +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:06:13PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 04:42:39PM +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:30:20PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > Since the variable's value is the size of an array, we can assume that
> > > > > it will never be negative.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at avionic-design.de>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid_modes.h | 2 +-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid_modes.h
> > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid_modes.h
> > > > > index 5dbf7d2..d65d863 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid_modes.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid_modes.h
> > > > > @@ -771,4 +771,4 @@ static const struct drm_display_mode
> > > > > edid_cea_modes[] = {
> > > > > 2492, 2640, 0, 1080, 1084, 1094, 1125, 0,
> > > > > DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC | DRM_MODE_FLAG_PVSYNC) },
> > > > > };
> > > > > -static const int drm_num_cea_modes = ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes);
> > > > > +static const unsigned int drm_num_cea_modes =
> > > > > ARRAY_SIZE(edid_cea_modes);
> > > >
> > > > Why do we even have these num_foo things? I think it would be clearer to
> > > > use ARRAY_SIZE(foo) directly where appropriate.
> > >
> > > Actually I was thinking about maybe writing a patch to move the table
> > > out of the header and into drm_edid.c (or drm_cea.c?) to make it less
> > > easy to create duplicates of the table. In that case, using the
> > > ARRAY_SIZE macro directly wouldn't be an option.
> >
> > Well drm_edid.c is the only one accessing these tables anyway, so it
> > they would be in drm_edid.c and static, you could still use
> > ARRAY_SIZE().
> >
> > Not that I really like the idea of polluting drm_edid.c with all these
> > massive tables.
>
> There's also the possibility to put the tables along with the functions
> that access them into a drm_edid_modes.c.
>
> > Too bad cpp doesn't support this kind of thing:
> > #if __BASE_FILE__ != "drm_edid.c"
> > #error ...
> > #endif
>
> We could fake that by protecting the tables using #ifdef NEED_CEA_MODES
> and define NEED_CEA_MODES in drm_edid.c before the drm_edid_modes.h file
> is included.
Yeah, I suppose there's no better way to do that. It's a bit ugly
though.
--
Ville Syrj?l?
Intel OTC
