On 07.04.2014 11:18, Thierry Reding wrote:
> If I understand correctly there's no immediate need for this to go to
> stable kernels, nor for it to be queued for 3.15, right? That is the
> potential extra write isn't causing any harm on actual hardware, is it?
> 
> In that case I'll queue this up for 3.16.

The reads and writes would get ignored on 32-bit kernel. The change does
fix sync point behavior in 64-bit kernel, so it is fixing a real issue.

Terje

Reply via email to